As part of bringing the master branch back in to next, we need to allow
for all of these changes to exist here.
Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
When bringing in the series 'arm: dts: am62-beagleplay: Fix Beagleplay
Ethernet"' I failed to notice that b4 noticed it was based on next and
so took that as the base commit and merged that part of next to master.
This reverts commit c8ffd1356d42223cbb8c86280a083cc3c93e6426, reversing
changes made to 2ee6f3a5f7550de3599faef9704e166e5dcace35.
Reported-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Remove <common.h> from all mach-sunxi and board/sunxi files and when
needed add missing include files directly.
Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
At the moment we have each SoC's memory map defined in its own cpu.h,
which is included in include/configs/sunxi_common.h. This will be a
problem with the introduction of Allwinner RISC-V support.
Remove the inclusion of that header file from the common config header,
instead move the required serial base addresses (for the SPL) into a
separate header file. Then include the original cpu.h file only where
we really need it, which is only under arch/arm now.
This disentangles the architecture specific header files from the
generic code.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Currently we do some magic "SRAM setup" MMIO writes in s_init(), copied
from the original BSP U-Boot. The comment speaks of this being required
before DRAM access gets enabled, but there is no indication that this
would actually be required that early.
Move this out of s_init(), into board_init_f(). Since this actually only
affects a very few older SoCs, the actual code goes into the cpu/armv7
directory, to move it out of the way for all other SoCs.
This also uses the opportunity to convert some #ifdefs over to the fancy
IS_ENABLED() macros used in actual C code.
We keep the s_init() stub around for now, since armv8's lowlevel_init
still relies on it.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
