mirror of
				https://github.com/smaeul/u-boot.git
				synced 2025-10-30 19:48:19 +00:00 
			
		
		
		
	Fix a few typos spot during a first read of the contribution process. Signed-off-by: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@savoirfairelinux.com> Reviewed-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
		
			
				
	
	
		
			133 lines
		
	
	
		
			7.5 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			133 lines
		
	
	
		
			7.5 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
	
	
| .. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
 | |
| 
 | |
| System configuration
 | |
| ====================
 | |
| 
 | |
| There are a number of different aspects to configuring U-Boot to build and then
 | |
| run on a given platform or set of platforms. Broadly speaking, some aspects of
 | |
| the world can be configured at run time and others must be done at build time.
 | |
| In general run time configuration is preferred over build time configuration.
 | |
| But when making these decisions, we also need to consider if we're talking about
 | |
| a feature that could be useful to virtually every platform or something specific
 | |
| to a single hardware platform. The resulting image size is also another
 | |
| important consideration. Finally, run time configuration has additional overhead
 | |
| both in terms of resource requirements and wall clock time. All of this means
 | |
| that care must be taken when writing new code to select the most appropriate
 | |
| configuration mechanism.
 | |
| 
 | |
| When adding new features to U-Boot, be they a new subsystem or SoC support or
 | |
| new platform for an existing supported SoC, the preferred configuration order
 | |
| is:
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. Hardware based run time configuration. Examples of this include reading
 | |
|    processor specific registers, or a set of board specific GPIOs or an EEPROM
 | |
|    with a known format to it. These are the cases where we either cannot or
 | |
|    should not be relying on device tree checks. We use this for cases such as
 | |
|    optimized boot time or starting with a generic device tree and then enabling
 | |
|    or disabling features as we boot.
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. Making use of our Kconfig infrastructure and C preprocessor macros that have
 | |
|    the prefix ``CONFIG``. This is the primary method of build time
 | |
|    configuration. This is generally the best fit for when we want to enable or
 | |
|    disable some sort of feature, such as the SoC or network support. The
 | |
|    ``CONFIG`` prefix for C preprocessor macros is strictly reserved for Kconfig
 | |
|    usage only.
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. Making use of the :doc:`device tree <devicetree/control>` to determine at
 | |
|    run time how to configure a feature that we have enabled via Kconfig. For
 | |
|    example, we would use Kconfig to enable an I2C chip driver, but use the device
 | |
|    tree to know where the I2C chip resides in memory and other details we need
 | |
|    in order to configure the bus.
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. Making use of C header files directly and defining C preprocessor macros that
 | |
|    have the ``CFG`` prefix. While the ``CFG`` prefix is reserved for this build
 | |
|    time configuration mechanism, the usage is ad hoc. This is to be used when the
 | |
|    previously mentioned mechanisms are not possible, or for legacy code that has
 | |
|    not been converted.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Dynamic run time configuration methods.
 | |
| ---------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Details of hardware specific run time configuration methods are found within the
 | |
| documentation for a given processor family or board.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Details of how to use run time configuration based on :doc:`driver model
 | |
| <driver-model/index>` are covered in that documentation section.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Static build time configuration methods
 | |
| ---------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| There are two mechanisms used to control the build time configuration of U-Boot.
 | |
| One is utilizing Kconfig and ``CONFIG`` prefixed macros and the other is ad hoc
 | |
| usage of ``CFG`` prefixed macros. Both of these are used when it is either not
 | |
| possible or not practical to make a run time determination about some
 | |
| functionality of the hardware or a required software feature or similar. Each of
 | |
| these has their own places where they are better suited than the other for use.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The `Kconfig language
 | |
| <https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/kbuild/kconfig-language.html>`_ is well
 | |
| documented and used in a number of projects, including the Linux kernel. We
 | |
| implement this with the Kconfig files found throughout our sources. This
 | |
| mechanism is the preferred way of exposing new configuration options as there
 | |
| are a number of ways for both users and system integrators to manage and change
 | |
| these options. Some common examples here are to enable a specific command within
 | |
| U-Boot or even a whole subsystem such as NAND flash or network connectivity.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The ``CFG`` mechanism is implemented directly as C preprocessor values or
 | |
| macros, depending on what they are in turn describing. While we have some
 | |
| functionality that is very reasonable to expose to the end user to enable or
 | |
| disable we have other places where we need to describe things such as register
 | |
| locations or values, memory map ranges and so on. When practical, we should be
 | |
| getting these values from the device tree. However, there are cases where this
 | |
| is either not practical due to when we need the information and may not have a
 | |
| device tree yet or due to legacy reasons code has not been rewritten.
 | |
| 
 | |
| When to use each mechanism
 | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | |
| 
 | |
| While there are some cases where it should be fairly obvious where to use each
 | |
| mechanism, as for example a command would be done via Kconfig, a new I2C driver
 | |
| should use Kconfig and be configured via driver model and a header of values
 | |
| generated by an external tool should be ``CFG``, there will be cases where it's
 | |
| less clear and one needs to take care when implementing it. In general,
 | |
| configuration *options* should be done in Kconfig and configuration *settings*
 | |
| should be done in driver model or ``CFG``. Let us discuss things to keep in mind
 | |
| when picking the appropriate mechanism.
 | |
| 
 | |
| A thing to keep in mind is that we have a strong preference for using Kconfig as
 | |
| the primary build time configuration mechanism. Options expressed this way let
 | |
| us easily express dependencies and abstractions. In addition, given that many
 | |
| projects use this mechanism means it has a broad set of tooling and existing
 | |
| knowledge base.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Consider the example of a SHA256 hardware acceleration engine. This would be a
 | |
| feature of the SoC and so something to not ask the user if it exists, but we
 | |
| would want to have our generic framework for such engines be optionally
 | |
| available and depend on knowing we have this engine on a given hardware
 | |
| platform. Expressing this should be done as a hidden Kconfig symbol that is
 | |
| ``select``'ed by the SoC symbol which would in turn be ``select``'ed by the
 | |
| board option, which is user visible. Hardware features that are either present
 | |
| or not present should be expressed in Kconfig and in a similar manner, features
 | |
| which will always have a constant value such as "this SoC always has 4 cores and
 | |
| 4 threads per core" should be as well.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This brings us to differentiating between a configuration *setting* versus a
 | |
| hardware feature. To build on the previous example, while we may know the number
 | |
| of cores and threads, it's possible that within a given family of SoCs the base
 | |
| addresses of peripherals has changed, but the register offsets within have not.
 | |
| The preference in this case is to get our information from the device tree and
 | |
| perform run time configuration. However, this is not always practical and in
 | |
| those cases we instead rely on the ``CFG`` mechanism. While it would be possible
 | |
| to use Kconfig in this case, it would result in using calculated rather than
 | |
| constructed values, resulting in less clear code. Consider the example of a set
 | |
| of register values for a memory controller. Defining this as a series of logical
 | |
| ORs and shifts based on other defines is more clear than the Kconfig entry that
 | |
| sets the calculated value alone.
 | |
| 
 | |
| When it has been determined that the practical solution is to utilize the
 | |
| ``CFG`` mechanism, the next decision is where to place these settings. It is
 | |
| strongly encouraged to place these in the architecture header files, if they are
 | |
| generic to a given SoC, or under the board directory if board specific. Placing
 | |
| them under the board.h file in the *include/configs/* directory should be seen
 | |
| as a last resort.
 |