This ensures the same environment layout will be used across all sunxi
boards, regardless of CPU architecture.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
This excludes options that are inherently ARM-specific or are specific
to legacy non-DM drivers.
Some help text is cleaned up along the way.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
This will provide a default value for RISC-V when that is added, and it
makes sense to put this option next to the other DRAM layout options.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
This provides a default value for RISC-V when that is added, and it
makes sense to put this option next to the other DRAM layout options.
While at it, provide sensible values for platforms with less DRAM.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
This provides a default value for RISC-V when that is added, and it
makes sense to put this option next to the other DRAM layout options.
While at it, provide sensible values for platforms with less DRAM.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Update this option to be based on SUNXI_MINIMUM_DRAM_MB. This corrects
the value used on V3s, which previously was the MACH_SUN8I default, and
so relied on addresses wrapping modulo the DRAM size.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
This option affects the ABI between SPL/U-Boot and U-Boot/scripts, so it
should not normally be changed by the user.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
This keeps all of the defaults for sunxi platforms in one place. Most of
these only depend on architecture-independent features of the SoC (clock
tree or SRAM layout) anyway.
No functional change; just some minor help text cleanup.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
While not especially likely, it is plausible that someone wants to build
U-Boot without GPIO or UART support. Don't force building these drivers.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
This was already supported by every machine type. It is unlikely that
any new SoC support will be added without SPL support.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
To maintain consistent behavior across architectures, most of the
options selected by ARCH_SUNXI should be selected for the D1 SoC as
well. To accomplish this, select them from BOARD_SUNXI instead.
No functional change here. Lines are only moved and alphabetized.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
With the introduction of the Allwinner D1, the sunxi board family now
spans multiple architectures (ARM and RISC-V). Since ARCH_SUNXI depends
on ARM, it cannot be used to gate architecture-independent options.
Specifically, this means the board Kconfig file cannot be sourced from
inside the "if ARCH_SUNXI" block.
Introduce a new BOARD_SUNXI symbol that can be selected by both
ARCH_SUNXI now and the new RISC-V SoC symbols when they are added, and
use it to gate the architecture-independent board options.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Some of the selected symbols have a user-visible dependency. Make the
selections conditional on that dependency to avoid creating invalid
configurations.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Two of these selections are redundant and have no effect:
- DM_KEYBOARD is selected by USB_KEYBOARD
- DM_MMC is selected by MMC
This selection has no effect by default and is unnecessarily strong:
- USB_STORAGE is implied by DISTRO_DEFAULTS
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
We tried to enable USB_EHCI_GENERIC and USB_OHCI_GENERIC by default.
This did not work because those symbols depend on USB_EHCI_HCD and
USB_OHCI_HCD, which were not enabled. Fix this by implying all four.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Implement the .get_function operation, so the gpio command can report
the current function. Since the GPIOF_FUNC (versus GPIOF_UNUSED) mux
values vary among the PMICs, report all non-GPIO mux values as UNKNOWN.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
There are three major variants of the AXP PMIC GPIO functionality (plus
PMICs with no GPIOs at all). Except for GPIO3 on the AXP209, which uses
a different register layout, it is straightforward to support all three
variants with a single driver. Do this, and in the process remove the
GPIO-related definitions from the PMIC-specific headers, and therefore
the dependency on AXP_PMIC_BUS.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Now that the PMIC driver implements the DM_PMIC uclass, those functions
can be used instead of the platform-specific "pmic_bus" functions.
Since the driver still uses the single set of register definitions from
axpXXX.h (as selected by AXPxxx_POWER), it still depends on one of those
choices, and therefore also AXP_PMIC_BUS.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Now that the PMIC has a DM driver and binds device tree subnodes, the
GPIO device can be bound that way, instead of from inside board code.
Since the driver still uses the single set of register definitions from
axpXXX.h (as selected by AXPxxx_POWER), it does not differentiate among
the supported compatibles.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
This is less confusing than half of the driver using "axp_gpio" and the
other half using "gpio_axp".
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
These PMICs each have two GPIO pins, and are supported by the axp_gpio
driver. In order to convert the axp_gpio driver to probe using the
device tree, the corresponding device tree nodes must be present. Add
them, following the same binding as the AXP209 and AXP813.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
